Kommentare zu: Testing the coverage metric of JMockIt http://blog.kopis.de/2009/11/20/testing-the-coverage-metric-of-jmockit/ Persönliches & Programmiertes Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:22:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Von: Carsten http://blog.kopis.de/2009/11/20/testing-the-coverage-metric-of-jmockit/comment-page-1/#comment-1110 Carsten Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:45:47 +0000 http://blog.kopis.de/?p=4104#comment-1110 I'm looking forward to it. I'm really into testing and providing metrics to monitor the software development process. Jmockit already has a place in my personal toolset and maybe I can drop Cobertura again. I have to read on your path coverage metric, and hope that you provide some examples in the documentation. I think I'll create a little example with a loop, an if and a switch to test the path coverage later today. :-) I’m looking forward to it. I’m really into testing and providing metrics to monitor the software development process. Jmockit already has a place in my personal toolset and maybe I can drop Cobertura again. I have to read on your path coverage metric, and hope that you provide some examples in the documentation.

I think I’ll create a little example with a loop, an if and a switch to test the path coverage later today. :-)

]]> Von: Rogério Liesenfeld http://blog.kopis.de/2009/11/20/testing-the-coverage-metric-of-jmockit/comment-page-1/#comment-1108 Rogério Liesenfeld Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:34:31 +0000 http://blog.kopis.de/?p=4104#comment-1108 The path coverage metric in JMockit 0.994 is still a work in progress, but it IS true path coverage, not simple branch/decision coverage. Actually, it probably is the first ever such implementation for Java. (I googled around, but couldn't find any "previous art", beyond the TCAT tool for C++.) The path coverage metric in JMockit 0.994 is still a work in progress, but it IS true path coverage, not simple branch/decision coverage.

Actually, it probably is the first ever such implementation for Java. (I googled around, but couldn’t find any “previous art”, beyond the TCAT tool for C++.)

]]> Von: Carsten http://blog.kopis.de/2009/11/20/testing-the-coverage-metric-of-jmockit/comment-page-1/#comment-1107 Carsten Wed, 09 Dec 2009 06:32:29 +0000 http://blog.kopis.de/?p=4104#comment-1107 The report looks similar to Cobertura now, but I think that's a result of measuring the same metrics. Very cool to see this feature in JMockIt! It enables the developer to check testing requirements <em>while</em> he is developing, not afterwards. Thanks for updating me with the link! :-) The report looks similar to Cobertura now, but I think that’s a result of measuring the same metrics. Very cool to see this feature in JMockIt! It enables the developer to check testing requirements while he is developing, not afterwards.

Thanks for updating me with the link! :-)

]]> Von: Rogério Liesenfeld http://blog.kopis.de/2009/11/20/testing-the-coverage-metric-of-jmockit/comment-page-1/#comment-1106 Rogério Liesenfeld Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:51:24 +0000 http://blog.kopis.de/?p=4104#comment-1106 I imagine this is what you would like to see in the coverage report: http://jmockit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/www/coverage-sample/index.html I imagine this is what you would like to see in the coverage report:

http://jmockit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/www/coverage-sample/index.html

]]>